![]() Liptak is getting off light (five-day suspension without pay) a Florida man with a jammer in his car for months got fined $48,000 (Opens in a new window). The only legal buyers of such equipment are government employees. ![]() The Federal Communications Commission says (Opens in a new window)"use of 'cell jammers' or similar devices designed to intentionally block, jam, or interfere with authorized radio communications (signal blockers, GPS jammers, or text stoppers, etc.) is a violation of federal law." Hell, it's illegal to even sell jammers in the U.S., but they're easy enough to buy from overseas (as long as the retailer doesn't get caught). ![]() Sure, what he did was technically illegal. The news about teacher (and former pro-wrestler (Opens in a new window)!) Dean Liptak getting in hot water for blocking cell phone signals in his Fivay High School classroom was exactly the wrong reaction on the part of administrators (and the government to be honest). How to Set Up Two-Factor Authentication.How to Record the Screen on Your Windows PC or Mac. ![]() How to Convert YouTube Videos to MP3 Files.How to Save Money on Your Cell Phone Bill.How to Free Up Space on Your iPhone or iPad.How to Block Robotexts and Spam Messages.She noted the bureau used present and former field agents, who can’t be named, in the investigation. “It does not matter if you are using them in a business, classroom, home, or vehicle.” The decision, she emphasized, “makes it clear if you are using unauthorized jamming equipment, we will find you and hold you accountable.” You cannot make them, import them, sell them, ship them, or operate them,” said FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel during the vote. “When it comes to signal jammers, the Communications Act is clear. The Commissioners agreed with the original bureau decision, and let the fine stand. Ravi’s asked for the penalty to be reduced. Ravi’s Import Warehouse asked for reconsideration, which the bureau denied, finding the company’s excuses that the FCC misapplied the law, were “unfounded.” Ravi’s then petitioned the full Commission for review, claiming that the company had a history of compliance and denying the owner tried to sell the jammer to the agent. The base amount was $17,000 and the bureau added another $5,000 for the owner’s “egregious conduct” for offering to sell the device to the agent, according to the agency. She did, however, offer to sell the jammer to the agent, according to the bureau.Īfter the investigation, the bureau proposed the fine and notified the company. ![]() She told the FCC agent she threw out the jammer and wasn’t willing to retrieve it for the agent. The company owner, Anita Bhatia, confirmed that Ravi’s used a jammer to prevent its employees from using their cell phones at work.Īccording to the FCC, the owner admitted that her son had been warned by AT&T that such operations were illegal. After determining where the illegal signals were originating, an FCC agent from the Dallas Field Office visited Ravi’s Import Warehouse with an AT&T representative. In 2017, AT&T complained to the FCC Enforcement Bureau about interference to a base station in Dallas. They can also interfere with aviation and marine communications. They interfere with critical communications, like the ability to call the police or fire departments or 911. It’s illegal to use a cell or signal jammer in the U.S. That’s the lesson from a cell phone signal jammer investigation the agency voted on yesterday when the Commissioners upheld a $22,000 fine for a Dallas-based business. Lying to an FCC field agent doesn’t help you. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |